Educational Staff Development Unit
  SSDD > ESDU Intro page > Guides and tips for staff > Guide to Learning Outcomes  
  UCE Birmingham Guide to Learning Outcomes Background
 
 

Download as PDF file

Download as Word document

 
1. Introduction

This page is designed to help you write appropriate learning outcomes when developing and revising your modules and programmes, and when devising assessment tasks.  It explains:

A number of sources have been used to create this document.  These are stated below should you want to read around the subject further. 

If you are new to this process, you may also find the information in the Appendix helpful.  The appendix provides the following information:

  1. A glossary of key terms
  2. Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956)

  3. Examples of learning outcomes 

  4. Good practice in writing learning outcomes

  5. Steps in writing assessment criteria

  6. Motivating students using criteria

Hyperlinked terms are explained in the Glossary section of the Appendix.

We plan over time to expand this document so that it includes real examples of good learning outcomes from existing UCE Birmingham course documentation from a wide range of disciplines at various levels. Click here for details. 

^ TOP  |  ˇ APPENDIX

2. What are Learning Outcomes?

Learning outcomes are the specific intentions of a programme or module, written in specific terms.  They describe what a student should know, understand, or be able to do at the end of that programme or module.  Learning outcomes are written bearing in mind the UCE level descriptors for that level or award.

^ TOP  |  ˇ APPENDIX

3. The Learning Outcomes process

Click on the graphic below to link to relevant sections of this Guide.

^ TOP  |  ˇ APPENDIX

4. What are the benefits of Learning Outcomes

Designing your courses using learning outcomes leads to a more student-centred approach: it marks a shift from the content of a module or course (namely, what staff members teach) towards its outcome (in other words, what the student is able to do on successful completion of the course or module).  

Learning outcomes can:

  • help to guide students in their learning in that they explain what is expected of them, in turn helping them to succeed in their studies.

  • help staff to focus on exactly what they want students to achieve in terms of both knowledge and skills.

  • provide a useful guide to inform potential candidates and employers about the general knowledge and understanding that a graduate will possess.

Good, clear learning outcomes will also be useful when compiling information for student Progress Files, which will soon be required of all universities.

^ TOP  |  ˇ APPENDIX

5. The Learning Outcomes process at programmes level

When designing a new programme, the QAA requires you to produce a programme specification, for which you use the University template.  This specification includes the aims of the programme and the learning outcomes for the programme.  It is essential that these programme outcomes refer to the outcomes of the entire programme leading to the relevant award, and when writing them, you must take UCE’s level descriptors, the QAA’s subject benchmark statements and, where applicable, Professional Body requirements into consideration.  You are required to categorize your programme outcomes in terms of:

  • knowledge and understanding
  • intellectual skills 
  • practical skills
  • key/transferable skills

For an explanation of these four categories, look in the Appendix under Level descriptors  

Once you have devised your programme outcomes, you need to make sure that their attainment is clearly achievable through the module outcomes on the programme.  If your programme covers more than one level (such as a Bachelor’s degree) you may find it useful to break down the aims of the programme over the levels so that you can verify that students are progressively working towards the programme outcomes throughout the course.

If you have any longer-term outcomes on a programme and feel a student may only be able to demonstrate them on completion of the programme, state them as programme outcomes, rather than module outcomes.

^ TOP  |  ˇ APPENDIX

6. The Learning Outcomes process at module level

A well-structured module should show clear alignment between the learning outcomes and the assessment criteria used on the module; in turn this requires you to design appropriate assessment tasks, and to deliver the module in a way which enables students to reach the required outcomes.  This alignment between learning outcome, learning and teaching method, assessment tasks and assessment criteria makes the whole process transparent to the students and to other interested parties, and helps you to ensure that there is coherence in your modules.  Use the chart below as a guide in this process.  

Click on the chart to link to relevant sections of this Guide.

Although the outcomes of each module have to correspond with UCE’s descriptors for that level, you don’t have to attain ALL the descriptors in every module.  Instead, you should make sure that students attain all descriptors on successful completion of ALL CORE MODULES at each level of a programme.

^ TOP  |  ˇ APPENDIX

7. Writing Learning Outcomes

Your learning outcomes should specify the minimum acceptable standard for a student to be able to pass a module or course (threshold level).  This means that it is important to express learning outcomes in terms of the essential learning for a module or course, so you should have a small number of learning outcomes which are of central importance, not a large number of superficial outcomes. 

We recommend that you aim for between four and eight learning outcomes for each of your modules, and up to twenty-five outcomes for an entire programme.

Start programme outcomes with the phrase:

‘A successful learner from this programme will be able to …’

Start module outcomes with the phrase:

‘On successful completion of the module, students will be able to …’
        OR, better still:
‘On successful completion of the module, you will be able to …’

These phrases lead you to use action verbs so that students are able to demonstrate that they have learned or achieved the outcome.  Verbs relating to knowledge outcomes – ‘know’, ‘understand’, ‘appreciate’ – tend to be rather vague, or to focus on the process students have gone through (e.g. ‘undertake action research’) rather than the final outcome of that process (e.g. ‘formulate strategies appropriate to their topic’), so use action verbs – ‘solve’, ‘evaluate’, ‘analyse’ – to indicate how students can demonstrate acquisition of that knowledge.

Make sure you only use one verb per learning outcome, and that you keep the sentence structure simple to avoid misinterpretation.  Avoid unnecessary jargon; if absolutely necessary, use more than one sentence to ensure clarity.
 
To help you write your outcomes, use Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956), which despite its age is still one of the best aids to writing good learning  outcomes. 

Click here for
Bloom’s Taxonomy

Bloom identified six categories of learning – knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation – which you can use at any academic level.  The first two of these relate specifically to knowledge and understanding, while the remaining four involve intellectual skills.  While it might seem tempting to concentrate on the lower two categories for lower level modules, we recommend that you do engage your students in higher level activities, albeit on a smaller, more focused scale, from the outset.  

When writing your outcomes, bear in mind the specific UCE Level Descriptors relevant to that level of study: use of Bloom’s taxonomy will help you to respond to the first section of the Level Descriptors, which relate to knowledge and understanding, and intellectual (thinking) skills.  For learning outcomes which relate to specific skills (as seen in the second part of the Level Descriptors), then you need to phrase your wording to describe how each skill is performed (for example, ‘will be able to communicate effectively and succinctly through oral presentation’).
 

 

Click here for
examples of learning outcomes

 

 

Click here for ideas for good practice in writing learning outcomes

^ TOP  |  ˇ APPENDIX

8. Linking Outcomes to assessment

As already stated, you need to ensure that assessment tasks are designed to fulfil the outcomes of a module.  One way of ensuring this is by directly linking your assessment criteria to your learning outcomes: this may involve a simple one-to-one correlation between outcome and criterion, or you may wish to have more than one criterion for each outcome.  This method makes the assessment process all the more transparent to students, and enables them to see the purpose of assessments more easily. Making regular reference to the out-comes of the module will also help reinforce this understanding.

 

 

Click here for a step-by-step
guide to writing assessment criteria

It is often helpful to combine intellectual outcomes and skills-based outcomes when devising assessments.  For instance, if your outcomes state that students will be able to:

  • analyse contrasting strategies for dealing with organizational change,

  • demonstrate that they are effective team workers, and

  • reflect on the role they play in groupwork,

you can then conflate these through one assessment, such as a group presentation with supporting group documentation including individual statements about the role each individual played in the final piece of work.  Three outcomes can therefore be attained through one assessment, and you will  need distinct assessment criteria to account for each of the stated outcomes.
 

Click here for ideas on motivating students with these criteria

^ TOP  |  ˇ APPENDIX

Plans to expand this guidance

In due course, the Staff & Student Development Department (SSDD) will be providing real examples of learning outcomes at different levels from a wide range of courses at UCE.  If you would like to send us any of your learning outcomes to use as examples, please e-mail your module outlines or course documents to David Green, or send them to:

Dr David Green, SSDD, Attwood Building/A042, UCE, Perry Barr Campus.

^ TOP  |  ˇ APPENDIX

Sources

BLOOM, B S, ed. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman.

Gosling, D & Moon, J (2001) How to Use Learning Outcomes & Assessment Criteria. London: SEEC.

Moon, J (2002) How to Use Level Descriptors.  London: SEEC.

QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCY (2000) Guidelines for Preparing Programme Specifications. Gloucester: QAA.

QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCY (2001) The Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Gloucester: QAA.

QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCY (2001) Credit & HE Qualifications. Gloucester: QAA.

Walsh, A & Webb, M (2002) A Guide to Writing Learning Outcomes. London: Learning & Teaching Development Unit, Kingston University. http://www.kingston.ac.uk/adc/writing_learning_outcomes.pdf

^ TOP  |  ˇ APPENDIX

 

Appendix

This appendix provides the following information:

  1. A glossary of key terms
  2. Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956)

  3. Example of learning outcomes 

  4. Good practice in writing learning outcomes

  5. Steps in writing assessment criteria

  6. Motivating students using criteria

1.  Glossary of key terms

Programme specification

A programme specification is a concise description of the intended outcomes or learning from a programme in Higher Education, and the means by which these outcomes are achieved and demonstrated.  The Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) requires programme specifications for all award-bearing programmes, and sets out the minimum information needed for each programme.  They are intended to provide a foundation for public assurance of academic standards and permit HE programmes and awards to be related to the national Qualifications Framework.

Subject benchmark statements

Subject benchmark statements set out expectations about standards of undergraduate degrees in a range of subject areas. They describe the attributes, skills and capabilities that a graduate with an honours degree in a specific subject might be expected to have. Each statement has been written by a group of academics and other specialists (such as representatives from professional bodies, industry and commerce) from the subject area.  For some subject areas, you may need to refer to more than one set of benchmark statements.

Level descriptors

Level descriptors are generic statements describing the characteristics and context of learning expected at each level.  These help guide your expectations of students and they are designed to ensure equivalence and consistency of standards across subject areas.  They are set out in the University’s Academic Regulations and Policies and are based on those recommended by the QAA.  

The first section of the descriptors for each level is a statement of outcomes which students should be able to demonstrate to be accredited at that level.  These relate to knowledge and understanding of the subject, and the intellectual skills required to make use of this knowledge and understanding. 

The second section of the descriptors states the wider abilities which a typical student could be expected to have developed at that level.  This incorporates both practical skills (i.e. those which are relevant to competence in your own specific context, such as lab skills, performance skills), and more general key/transferable skills (communication, problem solving, self-evaluation).  Depending on your context, these two categories of skills may well overlap.
 

 

NOTE
Learning outcomes and assessment criteria should be reviewed against these descriptors in order to develop modules and assign credit at the appropriate level.

Assessment criteria

These are descriptions of what the learner is expected to do in order to demonstrate that a learning outcome has been achieved.  They are set at a threshold level of achievement (in other words, a bare pass), and any performance above that level can be differentiated by applying grading criteria (see section 6 below).

^ TOP  |  ^ APPENDIX

2.  Bloom's Taxonomy (1956)

Comments in italics are our own brief explanations of the differences between the six levels of the taxonomy.  The list of verbs here is not exhaustive, and some appear under more than one heading.  

Click on the headings to link to examples for each of these levels.

>  >  Increasing level of cognitive complexity  >  >

< knowledge & understanding

intellectual skills >
Recalling important information Explaining important information Solving closed-ended problems Solving open-ended problems Creating ‘unique’ answers to problems Making critical judgments based on a sound knowledge base
Evaluation
Synthesis judge
appraise
evaluate
rate
compare
revise
assess
estimate
Analysis compose
plan
propose
design
formulate
arrange
assemble
collect
construct
create
set up
organize
manage
prepare
Application distinguish
analyse
differentiate
appraise
calculate
experiment
test
compare
contrast
criticize
diagram
inspect
debate
question
relate
solve
examine
categorize
Comprehension interpret
apply
employ
use
demonstrate
dramatize
practise
illustrate
operate
schedule
sketch
Knowledge translate
restate
discuss
describe
recognize
explain
express
identify
locate
report
review
tell
define
repeat
record
list
recall
name
relate
underline
 ^ TOP  |  ^ APPENDIX

3.  Example Learning Outcomes

The examples provided here are taken from a range of disciplines.  Outcomes relating to knowledge and understanding and to intellectual skills use Bloom’s Taxonomy as their basis.  There are then two further categories relating to practical (i.e. subject-specific) skills, and key/transferable (i.e. generic) skills.

 

Knowledge & understanding

On successful completion of the module, students will be able to:

  • Explain the meaning, character and identity of place, and how landscape is constructed.

  • Identify the theories of learning that are implicit in their current approach to education.

  • Discuss Romantic poetry in relation to the major themes of Romanticism.

  • Describe the underlying principles governing gene transmission and expression.
 

 Pointers on knowledge and understanding outcomes

  • Avoid learning outcomes which are TOO BROAD in scope, such as ‘Recall the fundamental concepts of Structural, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering.’

  • Avoid learning outcomes which are TOO NARROW in scope, such as ‘State the six categories in Bloom’s Taxonomy.’

  • Avoid overloading your modules with TOO MUCH 'CONTENT': knowledge and understanding outcomes emphasize what your students will be able to comprehend and explain, but this isn’t as important as being able to USE the information through application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation.

 ^ TOP  |  ^ APPENDIX

Intellectual (thinking) skills: application

On successful completion of the module, students will be able to:

  • Apply Kolb’s model of learning to the design of a teaching programme.

  • Illustrate, using phonetics, the problem of sigmatism in children.

Intellectual (thinking) skills: analysis

On successful completion of the module, students will be able to:

  • Appraise the key issues of market segmentation in a brewing industry case study.

  • Compare Hofstede’s theories of culture with those of Trompenaars and Hampden-Turner.

Intellectual (thinking) skills: synthesis

On successful completion of the module, students will be able to:

  • Create a set of criteria to assess Home Office implementation of immigration rules.

  • Design an engine component that conforms to the following criteria…

Intellectual (thinking) skills: evaluation

On successful completion of the module, students will be able to:

  • Explain the reasoning behind their allocation of scarce resources in the treatment of patients in an Accident and Emergency setting.

  • Prioritize conclusions they reached from an analysis of paint techniques, giving reasons.

 ^ TOP  |  ^ APPENDIX

Practical skills (=subject-specific)

On successful completion of the module, students will be able to:

  • Express themselves in writing for different professional and academic audiences.

  • Employ appropriate ICT skills in order to forecast demographic trends.

  • Use web-creation tools to produce an interactive website suitable for use by young schoolchildren.

Key/transferable skills (=generic)

On successful completion of the module, students will be able to:

  • Work effectively as part of a team.

  • Reflectively evaluate their own learning and personal planning processes.

 ^ TOP  |  ^ APPENDIX

4.  Good practice in writing learning outcomes: Suggestions

Open-ended learning outcomes

Not all learning is pre-planned: in many subjects (especially creative ones), students are expected to choose their own route through a module, and you can devise open-ended learning outcomes to reflect this.  For example, you could say that students are expected to be able to:

  • draw creatively on experience to devise work which integrates art forms

  • apply theory critically to analyse their professional experience

  • evaluate the impact of their clinical intervention

  • use a self-reflective approach to devising, developing and delivering project work.

^ TOP  |  ^ APPENDIX

Avoiding plagiarism

Learning outcomes can also be used to help avoid plagiarism:

  • Learning outcome: Students will be able to demonstrate the origins of their ideas by referencing sources used in their work.

  • Assessment criterion: Accurate use of the standard referencing styles within the text for all sources used.

 ^ TOP  |  ^ APPENDIX

5.  Suggested steps in writing assessment criteria

  1. Consider which learning outcome is being assessed (e.g. demonstrate critical awareness of social housing issues)

  2. Consider the assessment task set (e.g. present a self-made artefact to the group to represent your critique of social housing issues)

  3. Work out requirements for successful performance of the assessment, or the attributes required for this (e.g. clarity and fluency in terms of presentation; logical argumentation and marshalling of information in terms of content)

  4. If necessary, specify the range to clarify contextual factors and the level (e.g. demonstrate critical awareness of social housing issues since the introduction of right-to-buy in the UK, making appropriate reference to the recommended reading for the module)

  5. Focus on what is essential and categorize the requirements or attributes into clearly worded criteria

  6. Check that the criteria are measurable or assessable in valid and reliable ways and that the criteria are clear and unambiguous (e.g. ask colleagues to read the criteria to see if they interpret them in the same way)

  7. Repeat steps 3, 4, 5 and 6 until fully satisfied.

 ^ TOP  |  ^ APPENDIX

6.  Using assessment criteria to motivate students

In order to motivate students further, it can be helpful to use grading assessment criteria: while your learning outcomes have established the minimum requirement to pass a module, and can be linked to the minimum standard to fulfil a particular assessment criterion, grading criteria indicate what a student must demonstrate to achieve a higher grade.  You will then have a set of statements to help you differentiate the level of a students’ performance.  The idea behind this is that, rather than focusing on the threshold level stated in the outcomes, students can see the criteria for a First, or a Distinction, and will shift their focus to the highest level.  For example:

Learning Outcome:  
By the end of the module, students will be able to: Assessment criteria:
Fail Third Lower 2nd Upper 2nd First
use evidence appropriately in support of an argument.

 

Unsubstantiated or invalid conclusion, based on anecdotes and generalizations only Limited evidence of finding and conclusions supported by the literature and theory Evidence of findings and conclusions grounded in theory or literature Good development shown in arguments based on theory or literature and beginnings of synthesis Analytical and clear conclusions well grounded in theory and literature, showing development of new concepts

Grading criteria of this sort not only encourage students to aim higher, but also give them greater confidence in the objectivity and transparency of the marking process.

 ^ TOP  |  ^ APPENDIX

 

 

Educational Staff Development Unit
  ESDU intro page
  PG Cert
  Further MA modules

 

Educational development courses & workshops

 

M1/M69 events
  Guides & tips
  ESDU staff
 
  Learning Technology Development Unit
 
  Learner Development Unit
 
  SSDD Home page
About SSDD
Events Diary
Strategies
Links
Moodle
Module Designer
Quick reference & Search
Contact us
   
   
  UCE Birmingham

 

Legal notice  |  © SSDD 05 September 2006